Which player who has played for both the Memphis Grizzlies and Atlanta Hawks? NBA HoopGrids Answers for July 15 2024
by
Updated Jul 15, 2024
Which player who has played for both the Minnesota Timberwolves and Atlanta Hawks?
One of the player who has played for both the Minnesota Timberwolves and Atlanta Hawks is Shareef Abdur-Rahim.
Shareef Abdur-Rahim, a versatile forward, entered the NBA as the third overall pick in the 1996 NBA Draft, selected by the Vancouver Grizzlies. Known for his scoring ability and rebounding prowess, Abdur-Rahim quickly made an impact in the league, averaging double-digit points in each of his seasons with the Grizzlies.
His time with Vancouver and later with the Atlanta Hawks showcased his versatility as a player who could score inside, shoot from mid-range, and contribute on the boards. Abdur-Rahim was a consistent performer, known for his work ethic and leadership both on and off the court.
Throughout his NBA career, Abdur-Rahim played for several teams, including the Sacramento Kings and the Portland Trail Blazers. His ability to adapt to different roles and contribute as a scoring option and team leader made him a respected figure among teammates and opponents alike.
Despite battling injuries later in his career, Abdur-Rahim continued to demonstrate his scoring prowess and versatility, solidifying his reputation as a reliable forward capable of impacting games in various ways.
| Season | Team | Games Played | Minutes Per Game | Points Per Game | Rebounds Per Game | Assists Per Game | Field Goal Percentage | Free Throw Percentage |
| 1996-1997 | Vancouver Grizzlies | 80 | 36.6 | 18.7 | 6.9 | 2.2 | 45.10% | 81.10% |
| 1997-1998 | Vancouver Grizzlies | 82 | 39.3 | 22.3 | 7.1 | 3.4 | 46.00% | 78.10% |
| 1998-1999 | Vancouver Grizzlies | 50 | 40.1 | 23 | 7.5 | 3.1 | 44.30% | 81.10% |
| 1999-2000 | Vancouver Grizzlies | 82 | 41.2 | 20.3 | 10.1 | 3.1 | 45.40% | 81.10% |
| 2000-2001 | Atlanta Hawks | 81 | 40 | 21.2 | 9 | 3 | 46.30% | 81.10% |
| 2001-2002 | Atlanta Hawks | 81 | 39.5 | 19.9 | 9.1 | 3 | 46.40% | 81.10% |
| 2002-2003 | Atlanta Hawks | 65 | 40.1 | 20.1 | 9 | 3.1 | 45.90% | 81.10% |
| 2003-2004 | Portland Trail Blazers | 54 | 36.7 | 16.8 | 6.9 | 2.6 | 46.50% | 79.50% |
| 2004-2005 | Portland Trail Blazers | 54 | 32.1 | 14.3 | 5.4 | 2.4 | 45.70% | 76.70% |
| 2005-2006 | Sacramento Kings | 72 | 31.8 | 12.3 | 5 | 2.2 | 46.30% | 78.40% |
| 2006-2007 | Sacramento Kings | 80 | 36.6 | 16 | 7.5 | 2.2 | 45.80% | 79.30% |
| Career | 18.1 | 7.5 | 2.8 | 45.60% | 79.60% |
How to Play NBA Immaculate Grid?
In order to partake in the exhilarating NBA Immaculate Grid, participants are entrusted with the task of populating a grid that is replete with diverse criteria and conditions. These criteria may pertain to players who have graced multiple teams or attained specific statistical milestones, among other intriguing facets. Playing this enthralling game is conveniently facilitated through online platforms.
To successfully conquer the challenge, players must meticulously scrutinize the rows and columns of the grid, employing their astute judgment to make educated guesses that will culminate in its completion. It is imperative to note that each participant is afforded a maximum of nine guesses, as an incorrect answer will render the grid incomplete.
Embracing the interactive nature of the game, the NBA Immaculate Grid offers a captivating avenue through which one can test their knowledge of the league's captivating history, diverse teams, and legendary players, all while reveling in the sheer enjoyment it elicits.
When engaging in the spirited pursuit of the NBA Immaculate Grid, it is vital to thoroughly peruse and comprehend the meticulously outlined criteria and conditions that adorn the grid. These criteria may span a team's historical milestones, a player's awe-inspiring accolades, or even an array of multifaceted factors that pertain to the captivating world of basketball.
Therefore, unwavering attention to detail becomes paramount. Once the criteria have been meticulously studied and internalized, the participant can embark upon the captivating quest of deducing the names of the players who align with these very conditions. It is imperative to bear in mind that the number of guesses is limited, hence every single attempt carries significant weight.
