Which player who has played for both the Portland Trail Blazers and LA Clippers? NBA HoopGrids Answers for July 05 2024
by
Updated Jul 05, 2024
Which player who has played for both the Portland Trail Blazers and LA Clippers?
One of the player who has played for the Utah Jazz and has 5+ Assists per Game (Season) in his Career is Nicolas Batum.
Nicolas Batum began his NBA career with the Portland Trail Blazers after being selected 25th overall in the 2008 NBA Draft. He quickly established himself as a valuable wing player known for his ability to defend multiple positions, facilitate offense, and contribute as a scorer and rebounder.
Batum spent the majority of his early career with the Trail Blazers, where he developed into a reliable starter and a key piece of their rotation. In 2015, Batum was traded to the Charlotte Hornets, where he continued to play a significant role as a starting forward.
During his time with the Hornets, Batum showcased his versatility by handling the ball, facilitating plays, and providing solid perimeter defense. He became known for his ability to contribute across various statistical categories, making him a valuable asset on both ends of the floor.
| Season | Team | Games | Minutes per Game | Points per Game | Assists per Game | Rebounds per Game | Steals per Game | Blocks per Game | Field Goal % | Three-Point % | Free Throw % |
| 2008-2009 | Portland Trail Blazers | 79 | 18.4 | 5.4 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 46.20% | 37.90% | 80.30% |
| 2009-2010 | Portland Trail Blazers | 37 | 24.8 | 10.1 | 3 | 3.8 | 1 | 0.7 | 49.10% | 34.50% | 85.20% |
| 2010-2011 | Portland Trail Blazers | 80 | 31.5 | 12.4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 46.50% | 36.20% | 84.50% |
| 2011-2012 | Portland Trail Blazers | 59 | 30.4 | 13.9 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 1 | 45.10% | 39.40% | 83.60% |
| 2012-2013 | Portland Trail Blazers | 73 | 38.5 | 14.3 | 4.9 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 42.30% | 37.20% | 84.90% |
| 2013-2014 | Portland Trail Blazers | 82 | 36 | 13 | 5.1 | 7.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 46.50% | 36.10% | 76.30% |
| 2014-2015 | Portland Trail Blazers | 71 | 33.5 | 9.4 | 4.8 | 5.9 | 1 | 0.6 | 40.90% | 32.40% | 84.10% |
| 2015-2016 | Charlotte Hornets | 70 | 35 | 14.9 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 42.60% | 34.80% | 84.70% |
| 2016-2017 | Charlotte Hornets | 77 | 33 | 15.1 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 40.30% | 33.30% | 85.80% |
| 2017-2018 | Charlotte Hornets | 64 | 31.4 | 11.6 | 5.5 | 4.8 | 1 | 0.3 | 40.00% | 33.30% | 77.40% |
| 2018-2019 | Charlotte Hornets | 75 | 31.4 | 9.3 | 3.3 | 5.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 43.80% | 39.00% | 86.20% |
| 2019-2020 | Charlotte Hornets | 22 | 23 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 4.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 34.60% | 28.60% | 84.60% |
| 2020-2021 | Los Angeles Clippers | 67 | 28.4 | 8.1 | 2.2 | 4.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 43.90% | 40.00% | 87.10% |
| Career | 856 | 32 | 11.1 | 4 | 5.2 | 1 | 0.7 | 43.20% | 36.00% | 82.80% |
How to Play NBA Immaculate Grid?
In order to partake in the exhilarating NBA Immaculate Grid, participants are entrusted with the task of populating a grid that is replete with diverse criteria and conditions. These criteria may pertain to players who have graced multiple teams or attained specific statistical milestones, among other intriguing facets. Playing this enthralling game is conveniently facilitated through online platforms.
To successfully conquer the challenge, players must meticulously scrutinize the rows and columns of the grid, employing their astute judgment to make educated guesses that will culminate in its completion. It is imperative to note that each participant is afforded a maximum of nine guesses, as an incorrect answer will render the grid incomplete.
Embracing the interactive nature of the game, the NBA Immaculate Grid offers a captivating avenue through which one can test their knowledge of the league's captivating history, diverse teams, and legendary players, all while reveling in the sheer enjoyment it elicits.
When engaging in the spirited pursuit of the NBA Immaculate Grid, it is vital to thoroughly peruse and comprehend the meticulously outlined criteria and conditions that adorn the grid. These criteria may span a team's historical milestones, a player's awe-inspiring accolades, or even an array of multifaceted factors that pertain to the captivating world of basketball.
Therefore, unwavering attention to detail becomes paramount. Once the criteria have been meticulously studied and internalized, the participant can embark upon the captivating quest of deducing the names of the players who align with these very conditions. It is imperative to bear in mind that the number of guesses is limited, hence every single attempt carries significant weight.
