Which player who has played for the Los Angeles Lakers and Played in the 2020s? NBA HoopGrids Answers for July 04 2024
by
Updated Jul 04, 2024
Which player who has played for the Los Angeles Lakers and Played in the 2020s?
One of the played for the Boston Celtics and 250+ Assists (Season) in his Career is Kent Bazemore.
Kent Bazemore is a seasoned NBA veteran known for his defensive tenacity and three-point shooting ability. He entered the league in 2012 after going undrafted but quickly made a name for himself with the Golden State Warriors.
During his time with the Warriors, Bazemore earned recognition for his energetic playstyle and solid defensive contributions off the bench. His hustle and perimeter defense became a trademark as he helped the Warriors during their playoff runs.
In the 2014-15 season, Kent Bazemore joined the Los Angeles Lakers, where he continued to showcase his skills as a reliable wing player. With the Lakers, Bazemore provided valuable minutes off the bench, contributing not only defensively but also as a perimeter threat with his three-point shooting. His athleticism and ability to defend multiple positions made him a key rotational player for the team during that season.
| Season | Team | GP | MPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | PPG |
| 2012-13 | Golden State Warriors | 61 | 4.4 | 0.377 | 0.273 | 0.727 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 2 |
| 2013-14 | Golden State Warriors | 44 | 6.1 | 0.379 | 0.284 | 0.714 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 2.3 |
| 2013-14 | Los Angeles Lakers | 23 | 28 | 0.451 | 0.371 | 0.723 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 13.1 |
| 2014-15 | Los Angeles Lakers | 23 | 24.6 | 0.441 | 0.375 | 0.655 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 12.8 |
| 2014-15 | Atlanta Hawks | 23 | 28.6 | 0.44 | 0.364 | 0.704 | 3.6 | 1 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 13.7 |
| 2015-16 | Atlanta Hawks | 75 | 27.8 | 0.448 | 0.357 | 0.707 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 11.6 |
| 2016-17 | Atlanta Hawks | 73 | 26.9 | 0.409 | 0.349 | 0.701 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 11 |
| 2017-18 | Atlanta Hawks | 65 | 27.5 | 0.403 | 0.393 | 0.817 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 12.9 |
| 2018-19 | Atlanta Hawks | 67 | 24.5 | 0.402 | 0.32 | 0.732 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 11.6 |
| 2019-20 | Portland Trail Blazers | 43 | 33.3 | 0.43 | 0.342 | 0.824 | 4.7 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 13.1 |
| 2020-21 | Sacramento Kings | 37 | 27.3 | 0.406 | 0.404 | 0.769 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 10.3 |
| 2021-22 | Golden State Warriors | 61 | 19.3 | 0.429 | 0.382 | 0.789 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 7.2 |
| 2022-23 | Golden State Warriors | 72 | 21.5 | 0.438 | 0.361 | 0.822 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 1 | 0.3 | 8.9 |
| Career | 704 | 23.8 | 0.423 | 0.359 | 0.753 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 9.5 |
How to Play NBA Immaculate Grid?
In order to partake in the exhilarating NBA Immaculate Grid, participants are entrusted with the task of populating a grid that is replete with diverse criteria and conditions. These criteria may pertain to players who have graced multiple teams or attained specific statistical milestones, among other intriguing facets. Playing this enthralling game is conveniently facilitated through online platforms.
To successfully conquer the challenge, players must meticulously scrutinize the rows and columns of the grid, employing their astute judgment to make educated guesses that will culminate in its completion. It is imperative to note that each participant is afforded a maximum of nine guesses, as an incorrect answer will render the grid incomplete.
Embracing the interactive nature of the game, the NBA Immaculate Grid offers a captivating avenue through which one can test their knowledge of the league's captivating history, diverse teams, and legendary players, all while reveling in the sheer enjoyment it elicits.
When engaging in the spirited pursuit of the NBA Immaculate Grid, it is vital to thoroughly peruse and comprehend the meticulously outlined criteria and conditions that adorn the grid. These criteria may span a team's historical milestones, a player's awe-inspiring accolades, or even an array of multifaceted factors that pertain to the captivating world of basketball.
Therefore, unwavering attention to detail becomes paramount. Once the criteria have been meticulously studied and internalized, the participant can embark upon the captivating quest of deducing the names of the players who align with these very conditions. It is imperative to bear in mind that the number of guesses is limited, hence every single attempt carries significant weight.
